Post by Prof. Raspberry Cheetah on Jun 6, 2013 15:54:41 GMT -6
It's broken
No functiona
R
aspberry looked down at the piece of wood she'd cleaved to throughout her schooldays as a young adult student at Hogwarts. It had grown with her as she'd grown up, endured her accidentally stepping on it, the dare she took to put it up her nose, and the time when she'd almost eaten it, concealed inside a pranked sandwich. But now, it lay in her hands with a long crack across the top part, and broken into two pieces near the handle. She walked briskly through Diagon Alley, doing her best to hide her emotions of sadness, and feign the smile of someone who'd just won the lottery. When she reached Ollivander's Wand Shop, she noted the 'open' sign, clasped the handle, turned, and pushed the door in. Doorbells clanged in a tin-like tune.
"Awww, what a cute doorbell. I remember it last time I was here!", she spoke to herself aloud, something she did more often that she'd like to admit.
"Is anyone here?", she called, and tried to peer into the long rows of grand mahogany shelves, laden with all permutation of wand core, wand length, and wood type. "By gosh, there must be thousands of them... maybe millions. If there are six wand core types and fifty wand wood types and one, two, ... infinite? No, a wand would start at eight inches and go to eleven, so that's three times twelve is thirty-six... so six times fifty times thirty-six would be the unique number of wands here, but they probably have extras of each type, so that's at least... ten thousand wands all on these shelves... ", she started to consider now if that many wands would even fit in the square footage of the shop. And what if they were out of a kind? What if certain combinations couldn't exist together? She hadn't even considered the fact that there were in fact seven wand core types, and wands range typically from nine to fourteen inches long (so at least sixty different lengths), and that there were in fact, fifty-seven types of wand wood, making her assumptions incorrect.
At least she'd attempted to do some math, but come up short in several areas resulting in a vastly wrong answer. (The correct number of wand permutations is sixty times fifty-seven times seven, which is nearly twenty-four thousand. )